|TESTIMONIES OF KING JAMES BIBLE DEFENDERS|
During my teen years, I was greatly and positively influenced by my local church youth group as well as by the Youth for Christ movement, with which my home church was associated through the Detroit Voice of Christian Youth (VCY), the area YFC rally.
I attended the Detroit Bible Institute for one semester, receiving excellent Bible training there, and then transferred to Bob Jones University due to its strong evangelistic emphasis and its reputation as a spiritual hotbed for training aggressive soul-winning preachers.
At BJU, I received an A.B. with major in Bible and the B.D. (equivalent to todays Master of Divinity) from their graduate theological division. ... [I received] an honorary Doctor of Divinity (D.D.) from the now defunct San Francisco Baptist Theological Seminary. This seminary also placed my name in the Fundamentalist Hall of Fame. My alma mater, Bob Jones University, honored me in 1979 with its Defense of the Scriptures award, an award from the Bob Jones family, in honor of the BJU founder, Dr. Bob Jones Sr., and later granted me an honorary Doctor of Literature (L.L.D.) degree....
Regarding the KJV: Since childhood, I have maintained an implicit faith in the integrity and accuracy of the A.V., having been taught confidence in its contents by my parents, pastor and home church.
In the churches I pastored, the KJV was used exclusively in the pulpit, classroom and activities, this position being clearly delineated both in preaching and printed stated practice. A KJV only clause was inserted into revised church constitutions where I pastored.
A letter written to Dr. David Otis Fuller (published in the Jan.-Feb. 1995 Fundamentalist Digest) confirms this longstanding position. However, I never was involved in the textual background controversy until about five years ago, always stating that I left this issue to scholars to debate, simply defending and proclaiming the veracity of the KJV.
My initial concerns about the background text were aroused about 15 years ago, when I picked up the Nestles text that I had used in Greek classes at my alma mater and read the English introduction. To put it mildly, I was shocked by the destructive comments made by this noted Greek scholar concerning the textual basis of the KJV. It was then I began to take special note concerning the background texts underlying the various translations.
Since that time, my confidence (which has always been strong) in the A.V. has been immeasurably strengthened as I have pondered the fallacies of the Westcott-Hort text versus the time-tested reliability of the traditional Majority manuscripts.
After further consideration, about five years ago, as I witnessed the deluge of unreliable modern translations being published, and saw the deteriorating confidence in and disuse of the KJV among former defenders (a trend that appears to have developed into almost an open antipathy) I decided it was time to openly defend and promote the textual background basis of the A.V.
One of the purposes in beginning The Fundamentalist Digest was to help foster confidence in the KJV and its historical origins, as well as expose the pro-ecumenical, pro-apostate basis of the modern translations based upon the Westcott-Hort text.
It is my firm conviction, that the KJV, based upon what has become known as the Received Text is the ONLY Bible that retains ALL the fundamental doctrines of our Lord Jesus Christ, without any deletion, being a faithful translation of the text upon which it is based. This fidelity is due to a trustworthy text as its source, and the superior translation work of the orthodox scholars who produced this version.
While I am an ardent defender of the Received Text and the Authorized Version (A.V.), my ministry is not devoted exclusively to this theme: my main ministry being one of preaching in Bible conferences and evangelistic endeavors. Through the printed page, I seek to defend the faith once delivered unto the saints, providing instruction and inspiration as well.
The March-April 1994 and January-February 1995 issues of The Fundamentalist Digest were devoted almost exclusively to the defense and promotion of the KJV.
As we approach the end of the 20th century and the potential advent of another millennium, I do not believe if the Lord tarries, that any of the organized professing fundamentalist fellowships of this generation (FBF, IBFNA, BBF, WBF, etc.) will hold the line on the important issues of the Bible texts or Biblical separation, believing they have already, in essence, capitulated to the pressures of the age.
The position of openness or silence in the above matters will turn, as it already now is, to antipathy and antagonism towards defenders of these vital two twin and corollary truths.
I further believe that Satan, counterfeiting every possible phase of Gods work he possibly can, will produce his counterfeit ecumenical Bible. It appears entirely possible that the NIV or a successor to it, founded upon it, may accomplish that objective. A false Christ will lead humanity into a false faith, based upon a false text acceptable to all, but with a distinctly evangelical face, in order to deceive the last holdout against the New World Orderthe professing conservative evangelical or fundamentalist Christian.
It appears entirely possible, from this viewers perspective, that the majority of professing fundamentalism may incorporate many of the characteristics of the apostasy into its practical operations by the turn of the century, while still claiming allegiance to fundamentalism.
I do NOT believe that a stand only on the KJV and its underlying text is sufficient to ward off this encroaching apostasy. I believe, to maintain a pure faith, free from all taint of apostasy, we must ADHERE TO THE PRACTICAL DAILY AUTHORITY OF GODS WORD, particularly in the area of conventional standards and music, as well as ACCEPTING ITS PRESERVED AUTHENTICITY.
It appears there are many professing fundamentalists who will wave adherence to their KJV, but NOT accept its authoritative standards in DAILY living: marriage, family living, standards, music, etc. Some churches promoting the KJV ONLY, in the writers opinion, are as close to the apostasy as others who openly deny its veracity, a sad, deplorable but factual reality. THE WRITER OF THESE WORDS DESIRES TO STAND BOTH FOR ITS PRINTED AUTHENTICITY AND ITS PRACTICAL AUTHORITY UNTIL OUR LORD RETURNS OR HIS EARTHLY PILGRIMAGE IS COMPLETED (emphasis in the original) (Don Jasmin, Letter, May 23, 1995).
That Dr. Jasmins position on the King James Bible is longstanding is evident from a letter he wrote to D.O. Fuller in March 13, 1973. This letter was printed in the January-February 1995 issue of Dr. Jasmins paper. The caps are exactly as in the original letter:
"Dear Dr. Fuller:
"I have a copy of your book and have loaned it to friends. It has helped to strengthen their faith in the Inspired Word in the midst of the many perverted translations that are floating about these days.
"Praise God that you are not afraid to speak on this matter; if only we had 1,000 more voices like yours on this issue. ITS ABOUT TIME SOMEONE STOOD UP FOR THE BIBLE AND THE BEST TRANSLATION OF THE BIBLE AVAILABLE TODAYTHE KJV.
"These mod, loose translations are not only PERVERTING, CHANGING, DELETING AND ADDING TO GODS WORD, BUT ARE MAKING LAZY CHRISTIANS! My sympathy lies with youth who are being sold a false bill of goods on these paraphrases. Are these the Bibles that our future GARBC youth will use as deacons and pastors? GOD HELP US!"